Gordon Forgey

The most controversial issue to be voted upon in November is Initiative 522.

If passed, this initiative would require special labeling of some genetically modified foods.

Opponents say that I-522 is clunky, incomplete and politically motivated. They claim that it will be expensive for the consumer as well.

All these things seem true.

Consumers deserve to know what is in their food and food products. It is a basic right-to-know issue. Nutritional labeling has been required on foods for years. It allows the consumer to make some educated choices as to what to eat and what not to eat.

The I-522 labeling is more than just information. It would require conspicuous labeling on the front of the packaging, presuming that all genetically modified foods and ingredients are bad or so called Frankenfoods.

The presumption is not correct.

A way of informing consumers about genetically modified foods may be a good thing.

I-522 is not it. It attaches a stigma to the foods. There are not even front-of-package warnings on cigarettes.

Furthermore, foods served in restaurants, including fast food restaurants, meats and diary products are exempt from the labeling. So would be food of foreign origin.

Many agricultural businesses and organizations are against I-522. Many businesses and organizations farther away from the fields and animal pens are against it as well. They have compelling reasons for voting down I-522.

Reportedly, the European Union has labeling requirements that are far more reasonable than I-522. Consumers who want more labeling information need to find smarter and more constructive ways of reaching that goal. I-522 is not it.

Gordon Forgey

Publisher