Wolf hunting season may solve issue

As clashes between wolves and cattle continue

this fall, the discovery of six poisoned wolves in Stevens County and the hearing of arguments that could end grazing in the Colville National Forest by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals have created another complication

in an already difficult situation managing

growing wolf populations.

Depredations continue

to be confirmed, putting the state Department

of Fish and Wildlife in conflict with environmental

activists if they issue kill orders and with livestock owners if they don’t.

The issue of gray wolf-livestock interaction continues to fester, in large part, because two-thirds of the state’s established

gray wolf packs live in Northeastern Washington and seem disinclined to relocate on their own.

According to the most recent report from the state Department of Fish and Wildlife, there are “at least 206 known wolves in 33 known packs including at least 19 breeding pairs” in our state. This is particularly

important because Washington’s gray wolf population has grown tremendously since 2008. The state agency reports an average population growth of 28% every year for more than a decade.

The poisoning

of six gray wolves in Stevens

County could be a problem

for farmers and ranchers following

the rules by using all the non-lethal deterrents

authorized by the state Department

of Fish and Wildlife. Farmers and ranchers are allowed to shoot gray wolves caught in the act of depredation and can report it without fear of prosecution.

However, wolves are notoriously difficult to catch “in-the-act.”

For the three-judge appeals court panel in Portland, it may also reinforce

the arguments made by environmental activitsts in WildEarth Guardians, Western Watersheds Project and Kettle Range Conservation Group in their appeals court argument that when “non-lethal

deterrents fail, allotments should be declared

unsuitable

for grazing” because of the increased interactions between livestock owners and wolves.

The shortest route to a resolution is to declare gray wolves recovered in Eastern Washington and begin developing a management

program that allows for responsible species growth while giving

farmers and ranchers most effected by wolves the ability to protect their livelihood.

Statements from activist

groups would have the public believe gray wolf recovery in our state is in grave danger. The Center for Biological Diversity

wrote, “With the unbridled wolf slaughter occurring just east of us, the need for strong rules that work to lessen conflict

is more vital now than ever.”

This is ridiculous and inaccurate hyperbole.

In fact, the state has only removed two wolves this year involved in depredations

and the total population is, again, likely

to increase significantly.

If the state continues to turn a blind eye to the problem of predator management,

gray wolves will continue to run afoul of farmers and ranchers desperate to save their livestock. Bridging the divide between ranchers and apex predators may be as simple as allowing livestock producers the freedom to protect their livelihood by issuing annual

hunting tags for wolves, as the Colville Confederated Tribes currently

do, and allowing packs that are not troubling

livestock to continue

to live off the land.

Pam Lewison is the director of the initiative on agriculture for the Washington Policy Center.

Email her at plewison@

washingtonpolicy.org.